缓存、限流与成本优化

Build~45 minutesPython先修要求: Phase 11 Lesson 09 (Function Calling)
大多数 AI 创业公司不是死于糟糕的模型,而是死于糟糕的单位经济。一次 GPT-4o 调用只值几分钱的一小部分。一万名用户每人每天调用十次,光输入 token 就要花 250 美元——而你还没收到一分钱。活下来的公司,把每一次 API 调用都当作一笔财务交易,而不是一次 function call。

Related: Phase 11 · 15(Prompt Caching)——本课讲应用层缓存(语义缓存、精确哈希缓存、模型路由)。第 15 课讲提供商层 prompt 缓存(Anthropic cache_control、OpenAI 自动缓存、Gemini CachedContent)。两者结合可降低 50-95% 成本。

学习目标
  • 实现语义缓存,对重复或相似的查询直接返回缓存结果,而不是发起新的 API 调用
  • 计算各提供商的单次请求成本,并实现 token 感知的限流和预算告警
  • 构建成本优化层,包含 prompt 压缩、模型路由(昂贵模型与廉价模型)和响应缓存
  • 针对不同查询类型,设计由精确匹配、语义相似度和前缀缓存组成的分层缓存策略

问题

你构建了一个 RAG 聊天机器人。它运行得很漂亮。用户很喜欢它。

然后账单到了。

GPT-5 每百万输入 token 收费 5 美元,每百万输出 token 收费 15 美元。Claude Opus 4.7 为输入 15 美元 / 输出 75 美元。Gemini 3 Pro 为输入 1.25 美元 / 输出 5 美元。GPT-5-mini 为 0.25/2 美元。下文价格仅为示意,请始终以提供商当前的定价页面为准。

这是能压垮创业公司的算术:

  • 每天 10,000 名活跃用户
  • 每位用户每天 10 次查询
  • 每次查询 1,000 个输入 token(system prompt + 上下文 + 用户消息)
  • 每次响应 500 个输出 token

每日输入成本: 10,000 x 10 x 1,000 / 1,000,000 x $2.50 = $250/day

每日输出成本: 10,000 x 10 x 500 / 1,000,000 x $10.00 = $500/day

每月总计: $22,500/month

这还只是 LLM。再加上 embedding、向量数据库托管、基础设施。一个聊天机器人每月要花 30,000 美元。

残酷的地方在于:这些查询中有 40-60% 是近似重复的。用户用略有不同的话问同样的问题。你的 system prompt——每个请求都一模一样——每次都会被计费。RAG 检索到的上下文文档,在问同一话题的用户之间反复出现。

你正在为冗余计算支付全价。

概念

一次 LLM 调用的成本解剖

每次 API 调用都有五个成本组成部分。

graph LR
    A[User Query] --> B[System Prompt<br/>500-2000 tokens]
    A --> C[Retrieved Context<br/>500-4000 tokens]
    A --> D[User Message<br/>50-500 tokens]
    B --> E[Input Cost<br/>$2.50/1M tokens]
    C --> E
    D --> E
    E --> F[Model Processing]
    F --> G[Output Cost<br/>$10.00/1M tokens]

System prompt 是无声的杀手。一个 1,500 token 的 system prompt 随每个请求发送,光这段前缀在每百万次请求上就要花 3.75 美元。按每天 10 万次请求计算,就是每天 375 美元——每月 11,250 美元——为的是一段永远不变的文本。

提供商缓存:内置折扣

到 2026 年,三大提供商都提供提供商侧的 prompt 缓存,但机制各不相同。深入内容见 Phase 11 · 15。

提供商机制折扣最小长度缓存时长
Anthropic显式 cache_control 标记命中缓存时 90%(写入时多付 25%)1,024 tokens(Sonnet/Opus),2,048(Haiku)默认 5 分钟;可扩展至 1 小时(写入溢价 2 倍)
OpenAI自动前缀匹配命中缓存时 50%1,024 tokens尽力而为,最长 1 小时
Google Gemini显式 CachedContent API约 75% 降幅(另加存储费)4,096(Flash)/ 32,768(Pro)用户可配置 TTL

Anthropic 的做法是显式的。你用 cache_control: {"type": "ephemeral"} 标记 prompt 的某些部分。首次请求支付 25% 的写入溢价。后续具有相同前缀的请求享受 90% 折扣。一个通常花费 0.005 美元的 2,000 token system prompt,在缓存命中时只需 0.000625 美元。在 10 万次请求上,这每天节省 437.50 美元。

OpenAI 的做法是自动的。任何与之前请求匹配的 prompt 前缀都享受 50% 折扣,无需标记。代价是:折扣更少、控制更少,但零实现成本。

语义缓存:你的自定义层

提供商缓存只对完全相同的前缀有效。语义缓存处理更难的情况:表达不同、含义相同的查询。

「What is the return policy?」和「How do I return an item?」是两个不同的字符串,但意图相同。语义缓存把两个查询都做 embedding,计算余弦相似度,如果相似度超过阈值(通常为 0.92-0.95)就返回缓存响应。

flowchart TD
    A[User Query] --> B[Embed Query]
    B --> C{Similar query<br/>in cache?}
    C -->|sim > 0.95| D[Return Cached Response]
    C -->|sim < 0.95| E[Call LLM API]
    E --> F[Cache Response<br/>with Embedding]
    F --> G[Return Response]
    D --> G

embedding 的成本可以忽略不计。OpenAI 的 text-embedding-3-small 每百万 token 收费 0.02 美元。与完整的 LLM 调用相比,检查缓存的成本几乎为零。

精确缓存:哈希与匹配

对于确定性调用(temperature=0、相同模型、相同 prompt),精确缓存更简单也更快。对完整 prompt 做哈希,查缓存,命中就返回。

这非常适合以下场景:

  • system prompt + 固定上下文 + 完全相同的用户查询
  • 工具定义完全相同的 function calling
  • 同一文档会被处理多次的批处理

限流:保护你的预算

限流不只是为了公平,而是为了生存。

令牌桶算法: 每位用户有一个装有 N 个 token 的桶,以每秒 R 个的速率补充。请求从桶中消耗 token。如果桶空了,请求就被拒绝。这样既允许突发(一次用完整个桶),又强制了平均速率。

每用户配额: 按用户层级设置每日/每月 token 上限。

层级每日 token 上限每分钟最大请求数模型访问权限
免费50,00010仅 GPT-4o-mini
Pro500,00060GPT-4o、Claude Sonnet
企业5,000,000300所有模型

模型路由:合适的模型做合适的事

不是每个查询都需要 GPT-4o。

「商店几点关门?」不需要一个输出每百万 token 10 美元的模型。输出每百万 0.60 美元的 GPT-4o-mini 就能完美处理。输出每百万 1.25 美元的 Claude Haiku 也能处理。一个简单的分类器就能把廉价查询路由到廉价模型,把复杂查询路由到昂贵模型。

flowchart TD
    A[User Query] --> B[Complexity Classifier]
    B -->|Simple: lookup, FAQ| C[GPT-4o-mini<br/>$0.15/$0.60 per 1M]
    B -->|Medium: analysis, summary| D[Claude Sonnet<br/>$3.00/$15.00 per 1M]
    B -->|Complex: reasoning, code| E[GPT-4o / Claude Opus<br/>$2.50/$10.00+]

调优良好的路由器仅模型成本就能节省 40-70%。

成本追踪:知道钱花在哪

你无法优化你没有度量的东西。记录每次 API 调用:

  • 时间戳
  • 模型名称
  • 输入 token
  • 输出 token
  • 延迟(ms)
  • 计算出的成本($)
  • 用户 ID
  • 缓存命中/未命中
  • 请求类别

这些数据能揭示哪些功能昂贵、哪些用户是重度消费者,以及缓存在哪里影响最大。

批处理:批量折扣

OpenAI 的 Batch API 以 50% 折扣异步处理请求。你提交最多 50,000 个请求的 batch,结果在 24 小时内返回。

批处理适用于:

  • 每晚的文档处理
  • 批量分类
  • 评估运行
  • 数据富集 pipeline

不适用于:面向用户的实时查询(延迟很重要)。

预算告警与熔断器

熔断器在触及限额时停止支出。没有它,一个 bug 或滥用就能在几小时内烧掉你整月的预算。

设置三个阈值:

  1. 警告(预算的 70%):发送告警
  2. 限流(预算的 85%):只切换使用更便宜的模型
  3. 停止(预算的 95%):拒绝新请求,只返回缓存响应

优化栈

按顺序应用这些技术。每一层都在前一层的基础上叠加。

层级技术典型节省实现难度
1提供商 prompt 缓存30-50%低(添加缓存标记)
2精确缓存10-20%低(哈希 + 字典)
3语义缓存15-30%中(embedding + 相似度)
4模型路由40-70%中(分类器)
5限流预算保护低(令牌桶)
6prompt 压缩10-30%中(改写 prompt)
7批处理符合条件省 50%低(Batch API)

一个应用了第 1-5 层的 RAG 应用,通常能把成本从每月 22,500 美元降到每月 4,000-6,000 美元。这就是烧钱和做生意的区别。

真实节省:优化前后

以下是一个服务 10,000 DAU 的 RAG 聊天机器人的真实拆解。

指标优化前优化后节省
每月 LLM 成本$22,500$5,20077%
平均每次查询成本$0.0075$0.001777%
缓存命中率0%52%--
路由到 mini 的查询比例0%65%--
P95 延迟2,800ms900ms(缓存命中:50ms)68%
每月 embedding 成本$0$180(新增成本)
每月总成本$22,500$5,38076%

语义缓存的 embedding 成本(每月 180 美元)在缓存命中的第一个小时内就能收回。

semantic-cache静态版本未包含此交互图

构建它

第 1 步:成本计算器

构建一个知道主流模型当前定价的 token 成本计算器。

pythonimport hashlib
import time
import json
import math
from dataclasses import dataclass, field


MODEL_PRICING = {
    "gpt-4o": {"input": 2.50, "output": 10.00, "cached_input": 1.25},
    "gpt-4o-mini": {"input": 0.15, "output": 0.60, "cached_input": 0.075},
    "gpt-4.1": {"input": 2.00, "output": 8.00, "cached_input": 0.50},
    "gpt-4.1-mini": {"input": 0.40, "output": 1.60, "cached_input": 0.10},
    "gpt-4.1-nano": {"input": 0.10, "output": 0.40, "cached_input": 0.025},
    "o3": {"input": 2.00, "output": 8.00, "cached_input": 0.50},
    "o3-mini": {"input": 1.10, "output": 4.40, "cached_input": 0.55},
    "o4-mini": {"input": 1.10, "output": 4.40, "cached_input": 0.275},
    "claude-opus-4": {"input": 15.00, "output": 75.00, "cached_input": 1.50},
    "claude-sonnet-4": {"input": 3.00, "output": 15.00, "cached_input": 0.30},
    "claude-haiku-3.5": {"input": 0.80, "output": 4.00, "cached_input": 0.08},
    "gemini-2.5-pro": {"input": 1.25, "output": 10.00, "cached_input": 0.3125},
    "gemini-2.5-flash": {"input": 0.15, "output": 0.60, "cached_input": 0.0375},
}


def calculate_cost(model, input_tokens, output_tokens, cached_input_tokens=0):
    if model not in MODEL_PRICING:
        return {"error": f"Unknown model: {model}"}
    pricing = MODEL_PRICING[model]
    non_cached = input_tokens - cached_input_tokens
    input_cost = (non_cached / 1_000_000) * pricing["input"]
    cached_cost = (cached_input_tokens / 1_000_000) * pricing["cached_input"]
    output_cost = (output_tokens / 1_000_000) * pricing["output"]
    total = input_cost + cached_cost + output_cost
    return {
        "model": model,
        "input_tokens": input_tokens,
        "output_tokens": output_tokens,
        "cached_input_tokens": cached_input_tokens,
        "input_cost": round(input_cost, 6),
        "cached_input_cost": round(cached_cost, 6),
        "output_cost": round(output_cost, 6),
        "total_cost": round(total, 6),
    }

第 2 步:精确缓存

对完整 prompt 做哈希,对完全相同的请求返回缓存响应。

pythonclass ExactCache:
    def __init__(self, max_size=1000, ttl_seconds=3600):
        self.cache = {}
        self.max_size = max_size
        self.ttl = ttl_seconds
        self.hits = 0
        self.misses = 0

    def _hash(self, model, messages, temperature):
        key_data = json.dumps({"model": model, "messages": messages, "temperature": temperature}, sort_keys=True)
        return hashlib.sha256(key_data.encode()).hexdigest()

    def get(self, model, messages, temperature=0.0):
        if temperature > 0:
            self.misses += 1
            return None
        key = self._hash(model, messages, temperature)
        if key in self.cache:
            entry = self.cache[key]
            if time.time() - entry["timestamp"] < self.ttl:
                self.hits += 1
                entry["access_count"] += 1
                return entry["response"]
            del self.cache[key]
        self.misses += 1
        return None

    def put(self, model, messages, temperature, response):
        if temperature > 0:
            return
        if len(self.cache) >= self.max_size:
            oldest_key = min(self.cache, key=lambda k: self.cache[k]["timestamp"])
            del self.cache[oldest_key]
        key = self._hash(model, messages, temperature)
        self.cache[key] = {
            "response": response,
            "timestamp": time.time(),
            "access_count": 1,
        }

    def stats(self):
        total = self.hits + self.misses
        return {
            "hits": self.hits,
            "misses": self.misses,
            "hit_rate": round(self.hits / total, 4) if total > 0 else 0,
            "cache_size": len(self.cache),
        }

第 3 步:语义缓存

对查询做 embedding,当相似度超过阈值时返回缓存响应。

pythondef simple_embed(text):
    words = text.lower().split()
    vocab = {}
    for w in words:
        vocab[w] = vocab.get(w, 0) + 1
    norm = math.sqrt(sum(v * v for v in vocab.values()))
    if norm == 0:
        return {}
    return {k: v / norm for k, v in vocab.items()}


def cosine_similarity(a, b):
    if not a or not b:
        return 0.0
    all_keys = set(a) | set(b)
    dot = sum(a.get(k, 0) * b.get(k, 0) for k in all_keys)
    return dot


class SemanticCache:
    def __init__(self, similarity_threshold=0.85, max_size=500, ttl_seconds=3600):
        self.entries = []
        self.threshold = similarity_threshold
        self.max_size = max_size
        self.ttl = ttl_seconds
        self.hits = 0
        self.misses = 0

    def get(self, query):
        query_embedding = simple_embed(query)
        now = time.time()
        best_match = None
        best_sim = 0.0
        for entry in self.entries:
            if now - entry["timestamp"] > self.ttl:
                continue
            sim = cosine_similarity(query_embedding, entry["embedding"])
            if sim > best_sim:
                best_sim = sim
                best_match = entry
        if best_match and best_sim >= self.threshold:
            self.hits += 1
            best_match["access_count"] += 1
            return {"response": best_match["response"], "similarity": round(best_sim, 4), "original_query": best_match["query"]}
        self.misses += 1
        return None

    def put(self, query, response):
        if len(self.entries) >= self.max_size:
            self.entries.sort(key=lambda e: e["timestamp"])
            self.entries.pop(0)
        self.entries.append({
            "query": query,
            "embedding": simple_embed(query),
            "response": response,
            "timestamp": time.time(),
            "access_count": 1,
        })

    def stats(self):
        total = self.hits + self.misses
        return {
            "hits": self.hits,
            "misses": self.misses,
            "hit_rate": round(self.hits / total, 4) if total > 0 else 0,
            "cache_size": len(self.entries),
        }

第 4 步:限流器

带每用户配额的令牌桶限流器。

pythonclass TokenBucketRateLimiter:
    def __init__(self):
        self.buckets = {}
        self.tiers = {
            "free": {"capacity": 50_000, "refill_rate": 500, "max_requests_per_min": 10},
            "pro": {"capacity": 500_000, "refill_rate": 5_000, "max_requests_per_min": 60},
            "enterprise": {"capacity": 5_000_000, "refill_rate": 50_000, "max_requests_per_min": 300},
        }

    def _get_bucket(self, user_id, tier="free"):
        if user_id not in self.buckets:
            tier_config = self.tiers.get(tier, self.tiers["free"])
            self.buckets[user_id] = {
                "tokens": tier_config["capacity"],
                "capacity": tier_config["capacity"],
                "refill_rate": tier_config["refill_rate"],
                "last_refill": time.time(),
                "request_timestamps": [],
                "max_rpm": tier_config["max_requests_per_min"],
                "tier": tier,
                "total_tokens_used": 0,
            }
        return self.buckets[user_id]

    def _refill(self, bucket):
        now = time.time()
        elapsed = now - bucket["last_refill"]
        refill = int(elapsed * bucket["refill_rate"])
        if refill > 0:
            bucket["tokens"] = min(bucket["capacity"], bucket["tokens"] + refill)
            bucket["last_refill"] = now

    def check(self, user_id, tokens_needed, tier="free"):
        bucket = self._get_bucket(user_id, tier)
        self._refill(bucket)
        now = time.time()
        bucket["request_timestamps"] = [t for t in bucket["request_timestamps"] if now - t < 60]
        if len(bucket["request_timestamps"]) >= bucket["max_rpm"]:
            return {"allowed": False, "reason": "rate_limit", "retry_after_seconds": 60 - (now - bucket["request_timestamps"][0])}
        if bucket["tokens"] < tokens_needed:
            deficit = tokens_needed - bucket["tokens"]
            wait = deficit / bucket["refill_rate"]
            return {"allowed": False, "reason": "token_limit", "tokens_available": bucket["tokens"], "retry_after_seconds": round(wait, 1)}
        return {"allowed": True, "tokens_available": bucket["tokens"]}

    def consume(self, user_id, tokens_used, tier="free"):
        bucket = self._get_bucket(user_id, tier)
        bucket["tokens"] -= tokens_used
        bucket["request_timestamps"].append(time.time())
        bucket["total_tokens_used"] += tokens_used

    def get_usage(self, user_id):
        if user_id not in self.buckets:
            return {"error": "User not found"}
        b = self.buckets[user_id]
        return {
            "user_id": user_id,
            "tier": b["tier"],
            "tokens_remaining": b["tokens"],
            "capacity": b["capacity"],
            "total_tokens_used": b["total_tokens_used"],
            "utilization": round(b["total_tokens_used"] / b["capacity"], 4) if b["capacity"] else 0,
        }

第 5 步:成本追踪器

记录每次调用并计算累计总额。

pythonclass CostTracker:
    def __init__(self, monthly_budget=1000.0):
        self.logs = []
        self.monthly_budget = monthly_budget
        self.alerts = []

    def log_call(self, model, input_tokens, output_tokens, cached_input_tokens=0, latency_ms=0, user_id="anonymous", cache_status="miss"):
        cost = calculate_cost(model, input_tokens, output_tokens, cached_input_tokens)
        entry = {
            "timestamp": time.time(),
            "model": model,
            "input_tokens": input_tokens,
            "output_tokens": output_tokens,
            "cached_input_tokens": cached_input_tokens,
            "latency_ms": latency_ms,
            "cost": cost["total_cost"],
            "user_id": user_id,
            "cache_status": cache_status,
        }
        self.logs.append(entry)
        self._check_budget()
        return entry

    def _check_budget(self):
        total = self.total_cost()
        pct = total / self.monthly_budget if self.monthly_budget > 0 else 0
        if pct >= 0.95 and not any(a["level"] == "stop" for a in self.alerts):
            self.alerts.append({"level": "stop", "message": f"Budget 95% consumed: ${total:.2f}/${self.monthly_budget:.2f}", "timestamp": time.time()})
        elif pct >= 0.85 and not any(a["level"] == "throttle" for a in self.alerts):
            self.alerts.append({"level": "throttle", "message": f"Budget 85% consumed: ${total:.2f}/${self.monthly_budget:.2f}", "timestamp": time.time()})
        elif pct >= 0.70 and not any(a["level"] == "warning" for a in self.alerts):
            self.alerts.append({"level": "warning", "message": f"Budget 70% consumed: ${total:.2f}/${self.monthly_budget:.2f}", "timestamp": time.time()})

    def total_cost(self):
        return round(sum(e["cost"] for e in self.logs), 6)

    def cost_by_model(self):
        by_model = {}
        for e in self.logs:
            m = e["model"]
            if m not in by_model:
                by_model[m] = {"calls": 0, "cost": 0, "input_tokens": 0, "output_tokens": 0}
            by_model[m]["calls"] += 1
            by_model[m]["cost"] = round(by_model[m]["cost"] + e["cost"], 6)
            by_model[m]["input_tokens"] += e["input_tokens"]
            by_model[m]["output_tokens"] += e["output_tokens"]
        return by_model

    def cache_savings(self):
        cache_hits = [e for e in self.logs if e["cache_status"] == "hit"]
        if not cache_hits:
            return {"saved": 0, "cache_hits": 0}
        saved = 0
        for e in cache_hits:
            full_cost = calculate_cost(e["model"], e["input_tokens"], e["output_tokens"])
            saved += full_cost["total_cost"]
        return {"saved": round(saved, 4), "cache_hits": len(cache_hits)}

    def summary(self):
        if not self.logs:
            return {"total_calls": 0, "total_cost": 0}
        total_latency = sum(e["latency_ms"] for e in self.logs)
        cache_hits = sum(1 for e in self.logs if e["cache_status"] == "hit")
        return {
            "total_calls": len(self.logs),
            "total_cost": self.total_cost(),
            "avg_cost_per_call": round(self.total_cost() / len(self.logs), 6),
            "avg_latency_ms": round(total_latency / len(self.logs), 1),
            "cache_hit_rate": round(cache_hits / len(self.logs), 4),
            "cost_by_model": self.cost_by_model(),
            "cache_savings": self.cache_savings(),
            "budget_remaining": round(self.monthly_budget - self.total_cost(), 2),
            "budget_utilization": round(self.total_cost() / self.monthly_budget, 4) if self.monthly_budget > 0 else 0,
            "alerts": self.alerts,
        }

第 6 步:模型路由器

将查询路由到能处理它的最便宜模型。

pythonSIMPLE_KEYWORDS = ["what time", "hours", "address", "phone", "price", "return policy", "hello", "hi", "thanks", "yes", "no"]
COMPLEX_KEYWORDS = ["analyze", "compare", "explain why", "write code", "debug", "architect", "design", "trade-off", "evaluate"]


def classify_complexity(query):
    q = query.lower()
    if len(q.split()) <= 5 or any(kw in q for kw in SIMPLE_KEYWORDS):
        return "simple"
    if any(kw in q for kw in COMPLEX_KEYWORDS):
        return "complex"
    return "medium"


def route_model(query, tier="pro"):
    complexity = classify_complexity(query)
    routing_table = {
        "simple": {"free": "gpt-4.1-nano", "pro": "gpt-4o-mini", "enterprise": "gpt-4o-mini"},
        "medium": {"free": "gpt-4o-mini", "pro": "claude-sonnet-4", "enterprise": "claude-sonnet-4"},
        "complex": {"free": "gpt-4o-mini", "pro": "gpt-4o", "enterprise": "claude-opus-4"},
    }
    model = routing_table[complexity].get(tier, "gpt-4o-mini")
    return {"query": query, "complexity": complexity, "model": model, "tier": tier}

第 7 步:运行演示

pythondef simulate_llm_call(model, query):
    input_tokens = len(query.split()) * 4 + 500
    output_tokens = 150 + (len(query.split()) * 2)
    latency = 200 + (output_tokens * 2)
    return {
        "model": model,
        "response": f"[Simulated {model} response to: {query[:50]}...]",
        "input_tokens": input_tokens,
        "output_tokens": output_tokens,
        "latency_ms": latency,
    }


def run_demo():
    print("=" * 60)
    print("  Caching, Rate Limiting & Cost Optimization Demo")
    print("=" * 60)

    print("\n--- Model Pricing ---")
    for model, pricing in list(MODEL_PRICING.items())[:6]:
        cost_1k = calculate_cost(model, 1000, 500)
        print(f"  {model}: ${cost_1k['total_cost']:.6f} per 1K in + 500 out")

    print("\n--- Cost Comparison: 100K Requests ---")
    for model in ["gpt-4o", "gpt-4o-mini", "claude-sonnet-4", "claude-haiku-3.5"]:
        cost = calculate_cost(model, 1000 * 100_000, 500 * 100_000)
        print(f"  {model}: ${cost['total_cost']:.2f}")

    print("\n--- Anthropic Cache Savings ---")
    no_cache = calculate_cost("claude-sonnet-4", 2000, 500, 0)
    with_cache = calculate_cost("claude-sonnet-4", 2000, 500, 1500)
    saving = no_cache["total_cost"] - with_cache["total_cost"]
    print(f"  Without cache: ${no_cache['total_cost']:.6f}")
    print(f"  With 1500 cached tokens: ${with_cache['total_cost']:.6f}")
    print(f"  Savings per call: ${saving:.6f} ({saving/no_cache['total_cost']*100:.1f}%)")

    exact_cache = ExactCache(max_size=100, ttl_seconds=300)
    semantic_cache = SemanticCache(similarity_threshold=0.75, max_size=100)
    rate_limiter = TokenBucketRateLimiter()
    tracker = CostTracker(monthly_budget=100.0)

    print("\n--- Exact Cache ---")
    messages_1 = [{"role": "user", "content": "What is the return policy?"}]
    result = exact_cache.get("gpt-4o-mini", messages_1, 0.0)
    print(f"  First lookup: {'HIT' if result else 'MISS'}")
    exact_cache.put("gpt-4o-mini", messages_1, 0.0, "You can return items within 30 days.")
    result = exact_cache.get("gpt-4o-mini", messages_1, 0.0)
    print(f"  Second lookup: {'HIT' if result else 'MISS'} -> {result}")
    result = exact_cache.get("gpt-4o-mini", messages_1, 0.7)
    print(f"  With temp=0.7: {'HIT' if result else 'MISS (non-deterministic, skip cache)'}")
    print(f"  Stats: {exact_cache.stats()}")

    print("\n--- Semantic Cache ---")
    test_queries = [
        ("What is the return policy?", "Items can be returned within 30 days with receipt."),
        ("How do I return an item?", None),
        ("What are your store hours?", "We are open 9am-9pm Monday through Saturday."),
        ("When does the store open?", None),
        ("Tell me about quantum computing", "Quantum computers use qubits..."),
        ("Explain quantum mechanics", None),
    ]
    for query, response in test_queries:
        cached = semantic_cache.get(query)
        if cached:
            print(f"  '{query[:40]}' -> CACHE HIT (sim={cached['similarity']}, original='{cached['original_query'][:40]}')")
        elif response:
            semantic_cache.put(query, response)
            print(f"  '{query[:40]}' -> MISS (stored)")
        else:
            print(f"  '{query[:40]}' -> MISS (no match)")
    print(f"  Stats: {semantic_cache.stats()}")

    print("\n--- Rate Limiting ---")
    for i in range(12):
        check = rate_limiter.check("user_1", 1000, "free")
        if check["allowed"]:
            rate_limiter.consume("user_1", 1000, "free")
        status = "OK" if check["allowed"] else f"BLOCKED ({check['reason']})"
        if i < 5 or not check["allowed"]:
            print(f"  Request {i+1}: {status}")
    print(f"  Usage: {rate_limiter.get_usage('user_1')}")

    print("\n--- Model Routing ---")
    routing_queries = [
        "What time do you close?",
        "Summarize this quarterly earnings report",
        "Analyze the trade-offs between microservices and monoliths",
        "Hello",
        "Write code for a binary search tree with deletion",
    ]
    for q in routing_queries:
        route = route_model(q, "pro")
        print(f"  '{q[:50]}' -> {route['model']} ({route['complexity']})")

    print("\n--- Full Pipeline: Before vs After Optimization ---")
    queries = [
        "What is the return policy?",
        "How do I return something?",
        "What are your hours?",
        "When do you open?",
        "Explain the difference between TCP and UDP",
        "Compare TCP vs UDP protocols",
        "Hello",
        "What is your phone number?",
        "Write a Python function to sort a list",
        "Analyze the pros and cons of serverless architecture",
    ]

    print("\n  [Before: no caching, single model (gpt-4o)]")
    tracker_before = CostTracker(monthly_budget=1000.0)
    for q in queries:
        result = simulate_llm_call("gpt-4o", q)
        tracker_before.log_call("gpt-4o", result["input_tokens"], result["output_tokens"], latency_ms=result["latency_ms"], cache_status="miss")
    before = tracker_before.summary()
    print(f"  Total cost: ${before['total_cost']:.6f}")
    print(f"  Avg cost/call: ${before['avg_cost_per_call']:.6f}")
    print(f"  Avg latency: {before['avg_latency_ms']}ms")

    print("\n  [After: caching + routing + rate limiting]")
    exact_c = ExactCache()
    semantic_c = SemanticCache(similarity_threshold=0.75)
    tracker_after = CostTracker(monthly_budget=1000.0)

    for q in queries:
        messages = [{"role": "user", "content": q}]
        cached = exact_c.get("gpt-4o", messages, 0.0)
        if cached:
            tracker_after.log_call("gpt-4o-mini", 0, 0, latency_ms=5, cache_status="hit")
            continue
        sem_cached = semantic_c.get(q)
        if sem_cached:
            tracker_after.log_call("gpt-4o-mini", 0, 0, latency_ms=15, cache_status="hit")
            continue
        route = route_model(q)
        result = simulate_llm_call(route["model"], q)
        tracker_after.log_call(route["model"], result["input_tokens"], result["output_tokens"], latency_ms=result["latency_ms"], cache_status="miss")
        exact_c.put(route["model"], messages, 0.0, result["response"])
        semantic_c.put(q, result["response"])

    after = tracker_after.summary()
    print(f"  Total cost: ${after['total_cost']:.6f}")
    print(f"  Avg cost/call: ${after['avg_cost_per_call']:.6f}")
    print(f"  Avg latency: {after['avg_latency_ms']}ms")
    print(f"  Cache hit rate: {after['cache_hit_rate']:.0%}")

    if before["total_cost"] > 0:
        savings_pct = (1 - after["total_cost"] / before["total_cost"]) * 100
        print(f"\n  SAVINGS: {savings_pct:.1f}% cost reduction")
        print(f"  Latency improvement: {(1 - after['avg_latency_ms'] / before['avg_latency_ms']) * 100:.1f}% faster")

    print("\n--- Budget Alerts Demo ---")
    alert_tracker = CostTracker(monthly_budget=0.01)
    for i in range(5):
        alert_tracker.log_call("gpt-4o", 5000, 2000, latency_ms=500)
    print(f"  Total spent: ${alert_tracker.total_cost():.6f} / ${alert_tracker.monthly_budget}")
    for alert in alert_tracker.alerts:
        print(f"  ALERT [{alert['level'].upper()}]: {alert['message']}")

    print("\n--- Cost Breakdown by Model ---")
    multi_tracker = CostTracker(monthly_budget=500.0)
    for _ in range(50):
        multi_tracker.log_call("gpt-4o-mini", 800, 200, latency_ms=150)
    for _ in range(30):
        multi_tracker.log_call("claude-sonnet-4", 1500, 500, latency_ms=400)
    for _ in range(10):
        multi_tracker.log_call("gpt-4o", 2000, 800, latency_ms=600)
    for _ in range(10):
        multi_tracker.log_call("claude-opus-4", 3000, 1000, latency_ms=1200)
    breakdown = multi_tracker.cost_by_model()
    for model, data in sorted(breakdown.items(), key=lambda x: x[1]["cost"], reverse=True):
        print(f"  {model}: {data['calls']} calls, ${data['cost']:.6f}, {data['input_tokens']:,} in / {data['output_tokens']:,} out")
    print(f"  Total: ${multi_tracker.total_cost():.6f}")

    print("\n" + "=" * 60)
    print("  Demo complete.")
    print("=" * 60)


if __name__ == "__main__":
    run_demo()

使用它

Anthropic prompt 缓存

python# import anthropic
#
# client = anthropic.Anthropic()
#
# response = client.messages.create(
#     model="claude-sonnet-5",
#     max_tokens=1024,
#     system=[
#         {
#             "type": "text",
#             "text": "You are a helpful customer support agent for Acme Corp...",
#             "cache_control": {"type": "ephemeral"},
#         }
#     ],
#     messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "What is the return policy?"}],
# )
#
# print(f"Input tokens: {response.usage.input_tokens}")
# print(f"Cache creation tokens: {response.usage.cache_creation_input_tokens}")
# print(f"Cache read tokens: {response.usage.cache_read_input_tokens}")

首次调用写入缓存(25% 溢价)。之后每次具有相同 system prompt 前缀的调用都从缓存读取(90% 折扣)。缓存持续 5 分钟,每次命中都会重置计时器。

OpenAI 自动缓存

python# from openai import OpenAI
#
# client = OpenAI()
#
# response = client.chat.completions.create(
#     model="gpt-4o",
#     messages=[
#         {"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful customer support agent..."},
#         {"role": "user", "content": "What is the return policy?"},
#     ],
# )
#
# print(f"Prompt tokens: {response.usage.prompt_tokens}")
# print(f"Cached tokens: {response.usage.prompt_tokens_details.cached_tokens}")
# print(f"Completion tokens: {response.usage.completion_tokens}")

OpenAI 会自动缓存。任何 1,024 token 以上、与近期请求匹配的 prompt 前缀都享受 50% 折扣。无需改动代码——只要检查响应中的 prompt_tokens_details.cached_tokens 来确认它生效了。

OpenAI Batch API

python# import json
# from openai import OpenAI
#
# client = OpenAI()
#
# requests = []
# for i, query in enumerate(queries):
#     requests.append({
#         "custom_id": f"request-{i}",
#         "method": "POST",
#         "url": "/v1/chat/completions",
#         "body": {
#             "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
#             "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": query}],
#         },
#     })
#
# with open("batch_input.jsonl", "w") as f:
#     for r in requests:
#         f.write(json.dumps(r) + "\n")
#
# batch_file = client.files.create(file=open("batch_input.jsonl", "rb"), purpose="batch")
# batch = client.batches.create(input_file_id=batch_file.id, endpoint="/v1/chat/completions", completion_window="24h")
# print(f"Batch ID: {batch.id}, Status: {batch.status}")

Batch API 对所有 token 提供统一的 50% 折扣。结果在 24 小时内返回。非常适合非实时工作负载:评估、数据标注、批量摘要。

用 Redis 实现生产级语义缓存

python# import redis
# import numpy as np
# from openai import OpenAI
#
# r = redis.Redis()
# client = OpenAI()
#
# def get_embedding(text):
#     response = client.embeddings.create(model="text-embedding-3-small", input=text)
#     return response.data[0].embedding
#
# def semantic_cache_lookup(query, threshold=0.95):
#     query_emb = np.array(get_embedding(query))
#     keys = r.keys("cache:emb:*")
#     best_sim, best_key = 0, None
#     for key in keys:
#         stored_emb = np.frombuffer(r.get(key), dtype=np.float32)
#         sim = np.dot(query_emb, stored_emb) / (np.linalg.norm(query_emb) * np.linalg.norm(stored_emb))
#         if sim > best_sim:
#             best_sim, best_key = sim, key
#     if best_sim >= threshold and best_key:
#         response_key = best_key.decode().replace("cache:emb:", "cache:resp:")
#         return r.get(response_key).decode()
#     return None

在生产环境中,用向量索引(Redis Vector Search、Pinecone 或 pgvector)替换线性扫描。线性扫描适用于少于 1,000 条记录的情况。超过之后,改用 ANN(近似最近邻)实现 O(\log n) 查找。

交付它

本课产出 outputs/prompt-cost-optimizer.md——一个可复用的 prompt,用于分析你的 LLM 应用并给出具体的成本优化建议及预计节省。

它还产出 outputs/skill-cost-patterns.md——一个决策框架,帮你为使用场景选择合适的缓存策略、限流配置和模型路由规则。

练习

  1. 为语义缓存实现 LRU 淘汰。 把最旧优先的淘汰方式换成最近最少使用。记录每个条目的最后访问时间,缓存满时淘汰访问时间最老的条目。在 100 个查询上比较两种策略的命中率。
  1. 构建一个成本预测工具。 给定一份 API 调用日志(CostTracker 的日志),基于过去 7 天的平均值预测月度成本。考虑工作日/周末模式。如果预测的月度成本超出预算 20% 以上,就触发告警。
  1. 实现分层语义缓存。 使用两个相似度阈值:0.98 表示高置信命中(立即返回),0.90 表示中等置信命中(返回时附带说明:「基于之前一个类似的问题……」)。记录每次命中的层级,并衡量用户满意度的差异。
  1. 构建模型路由分类器。 用基于 embedding 的分类器替换基于关键词的分类器。对 50 个带标签的查询(简单/中等/复杂)做 embedding,然后通过寻找最近的带标签样本来分类新查询。在 20 个查询的测试集上衡量分类准确率。
  1. 实现带降级级别的熔断器。 预算用到 70% 时记录警告。85% 时自动把所有路由切换到最便宜的模型(gpt-4o-mini)。95% 时只提供缓存响应并拒绝新查询。在 1.00 美元预算下模拟 1,000 个请求进行测试,验证每个阈值都正确触发。

关键术语

术语人们怎么说实际含义
Prompt 缓存「缓存 system prompt」提供商层面的缓存,重复的 prompt 前缀获得折扣(Anthropic 90%,OpenAI 50%)——OpenAI 无需改代码,Anthropic 需要显式标记
语义缓存「智能缓存」对查询做 embedding,计算与过往查询的相似度,超过阈值就返回缓存响应——能捕捉精确匹配漏掉的同义改写
精确缓存「哈希缓存」对完整 prompt(模型 + 消息 + temperature)做哈希,对完全相同的输入返回缓存响应——只适用于 temperature=0 的确定性调用
令牌桶「限流器」每个用户有一个 N 个 token 的桶,以每秒 R 个的速率补充——允许最多 N 的突发,同时强制平均速率 R
模型路由「抠门路由」用分类器把简单查询送到廉价模型(GPT-4o-mini、Haiku),把复杂查询送到昂贵模型(GPT-4o、Opus)——节省 40-70% 模型成本
成本追踪「计量」记录每次 API 调用的模型、token、延迟、成本和用户 ID,让你确切知道钱花在哪、哪些功能昂贵
熔断器「终止开关」当支出接近预算上限时,自动降级服务(更便宜的模型、只用缓存)或完全停止请求
Batch API「批发折扣」OpenAI 以 50% 折扣进行的异步处理——最多提交 50,000 个请求,24 小时内拿到结果
Prompt 压缩「token 节食」改写 system prompt 和上下文,用更少的 token 保留含义——更短的 prompt 成本更低,而且往往效果更好
缓存命中率「缓存效率」由缓存响应而非调用 LLM 处理的请求百分比——生产聊天机器人通常是 40-60%,成本按比例节省

延伸阅读

“Stay hungry, stay foolish.”

— Steve Jobs

esc
↑↓切换↵打开esc关闭